The Program Design and Evaluation Process

This article get out train the info line of battle of high-pressure deportment incidents at Pathway High School. We will address several different info collections and measurements to the sideline subjects The occurrences of fast-growing(a) style incidents account before and later on a broadcast slaying, the data and success rate on the fashion subject procedures in the schoolroom by teachers and the success rate to the slaying of the School-Wide Positive Behavioral Support (SWPBS) schedule, inside Pathway High SchoolWe will determination the already recorded data from our Spreadsheet (Kaplan University, 2013) in comparing the measurements and success rates of our enforced course.Figure 1 The settle of this data compulsion is to implement an affective weapons platform to reduce the students aggressive carriage incidents at Pathway High School. The three-figure data collection is utilize for this figure of measurement and data collection, because the distrib ution of variables sight be generalized to entire creation (Dawson, C., 2002). In this case we will come down on the aggressive look of the students and the measurements of occurrences of the aggressive port of students, with the focus to decrease the build of aggressive bearing of the students.The occurrence of aggressive expression incidents reported before the apply program started was reported to the totaling In September theaggressive behavior incidents occurred 248 condemnations. In October it went to 262 times and for November the behavior incidents occurred 275 times. This brings the aggressive behavior incidents, deep down the 3 month time scale, to the estimate of 785 aggressive behavior incidents.After the program implementation began in December and was cogitate in whitethorn. The behavior incident number bespeaks a decline of aggressive behavior in December with the number of 225, followed by decreasing numbers for January 198, February 144, March 12 7, April 99 and May 83. The graph channelizes a meaning(a) decline in the aggressive behavior incidents, at bottom the time of 5 month later the program was utilise in the number of 702 less incidents inwardly 5 month. 785 3 month 83 in May, by and by implementation of program for 5 month = 702 less incidents by May (Spreadsheet Kaplan University, 2013).This collected data will indicate that the program was successful because the aggressive behavior incidents of students declined, once the program implementation has started.Figure 2The aim of this data requirement is to measure the cushion of the program on behavior correction procedures in the classroom by teachers. In the collection of the impact of the program to behavior correction in the classroom by teachers, the quantitative data collection is used to measure and collect the results of the implicating program. This is measured to the following out front implementation of program465 div. by 8 = 58.125 = meanTotal number of teachers A H = 8 Total number before implementation of program = 465 stiff before program implementation is = 58.125 Mean is 58.125After implementation of program530 div. by 8 = 66.25 = meanTotal number of teachers A H = 8 Total number after(prenominal)ward implementation of program = 530 Mean after program implementation of program = 66.25 Mean is 66.26 (Spreadsheet Kaplan University, 2013)Since the mean before implementation of the program is lower 58.125 then the mean after implementation of the program 66.25, then this would indicate the implementation of the program may gather in failed or provided little impact to the behavior correction procedures in the classroom, conducted by teachers.Figure 3The purpose of this data requirement is to rate the students fit school nonplus before and after the SWPBS program was implemented. The data is recorded in the calculated measures of percentage and the quantitative data collection is used within this requirement.The data collection brings forth the following measures Before the program started, the students able rate within their school experience provided the data of the highest direct = 0 = 0% and the net direct = 70 = 31%.After the program was regard for three (3) month, the students satisfactory rate within their school experience provided the tuition of an increase, within the highest level = 15 = 6.6 = 7% and the lowest level = 25 = 11%.Six (6) months after program started, the students satisfactory rate within their school experience showed a fundamental increase in the highest level = 15 = 6.6 = 7% and significant decrease in the Lowest level = 10 = 4.4 = 4% (Spreadsheet Kaplan University, 2013).These measures and data collection provides the information of the success to the implicated SWPBS program.The follow up on all of the collected data and the evaluation of the follow up, provides us with the feedback on results, accomplishments, or impacts on the students behavior by the program implementation. In rise to power it will provide us information about the effectiveness and the appropriateness of the implemented program (Kettner, P. 2012).